see through the chaos: COVID19 Vaccine Questions

How have 100% safe vaccines been developed in eight months, when previous vaccines have taken a minimum of four years, and most take over 10 years? Especially given that Covid vaccines will be the first ever mRNA vaccines. How can we know of any potential long term health impacts when there have been no long term trials? Isn't the long-term possibility of 'Antibody-Dependent Enhancement' a very serious concern?

Why have the pharmaceutical companies sought (and been granted) exemption from vaccine liability claims?

Is it true that, once their trial was over, Pfizer vaccinated all volunteers who received a placebo during the trial? If so, did they do this to prevent us from being able to analyze the long term impact? Also, their vaccine needs to be kept at an extremely cold temperature (colder than most freezers). What happens if freezers malfunction and they're not kept at this temperature?

Are the vaccines actually designed to stop infection, or just reduce symptoms? If the latter, isn't vaccinating people just going to lead to contagious asymptomatic carriers, (given that we're told asymptomatic people are contagious)?

How long will partial immunity from symptoms, gained from these vaccines, last? Can't we enable and encourage people to do other things to reduce their chances of symptoms? Like addressing Vitamin D deficiency, for e.g.

How can we know how vulnerable groups will react to the vaccine, when it hasn't been tested on them? Many healthy trial volunteers have had quite bad side effects - if this was the reaction in the healthy, what might it be in the unhealthy? And aren't vaccines mostly ineffective on vulnerable groups anyway? (Given this, why has there been no effort to improve the overall health and immune systems of the vulnerable?!).

There have been two serious neurological events during the UK trial for the AstraZeneca vaccine, and one in India. What investigations have been done to prove that this was unrelated to the vaccine?

Having been spreading around the world, for nearly a year, isn't the virus now mostly endemic, with a significant degree of population immunity already reached (and seemingly already present)? Why is mass vaccination needed? Especially in many countries (like much of Africa) where the virus has had barely any impact whatsoever? Why must we vaccinate billions of people because of a virus that has been less deadly, to under 70s, than the flu? Surely, if there is a safe, effective vaccine, it just needs to be given to vulnerable groups, (like the over 70s)? Though, as mentioned, I don't think it's been trialled on them?

Will authorities be testing whether or not people have antibodies/T-cell immunity before they’re injected with a rushed, experimental vaccine? Do we know that it's safe to vaccinate those who've already had the virus and who now have natural immunity?

Do we know how the vaccine will interact with all other vaccines, and medications?

How can there be an effective vaccine for a virus that is constantly mutating? (It has mutated thousands of times).

How can we trust 'the science' from extremely criminal pharmaceutical corporations? Ditto the highly corrupted government agencies that will regulate them?

Why am I expected to get one of these rushed vaccines, to maybe lesson my chances of symptoms? Can't I just let my reasonably healthy body do what the human body has been doing for thousands of years?

As mentioned earlier, why are we putting all our hope into rushed and experimental vaccines, rather than on addressing the root causes that lead to susceptibility? Poor metabolic health, nutrient deficients, toxicity. There is so much evidence that Vitamin D deficiency is a significant contributor to susceptibility. Why is there talk of mandating vaccines, but no talk of mandating that we all ensure we have optimum levels of Vitamin D? This would be very cheap and easy!

All medical procedures involve risk. Where there is risk, there must be choice. I hope we can all agree on this?

Are we going to be told of the ingredients of the vaccines before they're administered? And will we be seeing peer-reviewed science about them all?

However small, don't we need to completely rule out the possibility that these vaccines will affect fertility? Pfizer vaccine info: 'It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.'

Is our entire approach to viruses based on very outdated science?

Is it true that Pfizer's '90% effective' vaccine requires 256 people to get vaccinated to benefit 1 person?! Is it not very misleading to only report the relative risk reduction, and not the absolute risk reduction? And is the relative risk reduction actually 29%, not 90%?

People with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from Pfizer's trials. Why were people not informed about this before the vaccine was rolled out?! There have been two bad reactions to the vaccine on one of the roll out.

Are lots of people allergic to PEG?

“The mRNA vaccines do reduce mild to moderate cases of Covid.” - how were they able to determine this when 90%+ of infected only get mild, to moderate symptoms or are asymptomatic anyway?

What about the risk of 'immune escape'?

Some Links

BMJ: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us

Elation or caution over COVID-19 vaccines? The evidence so far.

Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions

The Moderna Vaccine’s Antibodies May Not Last As Long As We Hoped

Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data

Covid News - Christmas Special Report

Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines

The Risks of Rushing a COVID-19 Vaccine

Dr. Simone Gold - The truth about the CV19 vaccine

Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data