see through the chaos: Why no jab for me?

- I have an immune system, that I've spent this last year caring for naturally

- the jabs weren't trialled to demonstrate that they stop infection/transmission

- studies have indicated that asymptomatic transmission is not a driver of outbreaks. (If I'm sick, I stay home!)

- the trials found an absolute risk reduction from the jabs of less than 1%

- in my view, it was criminally insane to have put all eggs in the vaccine basket in response to this disease, but it is what it is, and now the 'vulnerable' have been offered these jabs, so why do I need it? Offer it to those who want it, and that should surely be the end of it? Is it not extremely irrational for a jabbed person to demand that others have it?

- there's an argument that getting the virus from someone without symptoms is actually similar to getting a (traditional) vaccine, as you're getting a small viral load; enough to provide long-term protection whilst not making you sick

- we have science-backed, decades-old treatments, like Ivermectin. Why have people been denied this treatment? And others, like dexamethasone?

- we could also correct deficiencies in vitamins d and c, both essential for a well-functioning immune system. Just doing this amongst vulnerable groups would have been very simple to do! Why has there been almost no effort to promote natural health?

- why don't we have a study comparing vaccine efficacy to the efficacy of having optimum vitamin d/c, and good metabolic health?

- See Florida, Texas etc. Lots of places are fine without lockdowns, masks, jabs.

- the jabs are causing (hopefully mostly short term) harm in many. Watch this. They also seem to be killing some people; a very small percentage, but far more than any other vaccine in history. And in terms of long term harms? It is impossible to know at this stage. Antibody-depenedent enhancement remains a risk. And there's many other long term unknowns. These are a new type of vaccine. The inventor of mRNA technology (the technology used in the Pfizer and Modern jabs) has warned about potential safety issues with the spike protein (which is also used in the AstraZeneca vaccine, and others).

- the threat from this virus has been exaggerated. Even someone who is elderly with multiple commorbidities has a strong chance of survival. Provide ivermectin, fix Vitamin D deficiency, and that chance of survival might be almost 99.999%! Just as it is for non-elderly folks without commorbidities. And why no focus on healing these commorbidities?

- We are mass testing for a virus, for the first time ever (with unreliable tests). Why are asymptomatic people being referred to as 'cases'?! Having a 'pathogenic virus' in your system, but no symptoms, indicates very good health, not bad! We all walk around every day with supposedly pathogenic viruses in us! Read this. And this.

- why is pre-existing and naturally-gained immunity being ignored? Why are medical authorities not testing people for antibodies/T-Cell immunity before jabbing? I thought the precautionary principle was important?!

- the developers of the jabs are some of the most criminal corporations in the world, with long histories of deceit and corruption; knowingly putting unsafe, unproven products to market. Profit is the priority! How can we put total faith in 'science' coming from such organizations, that will make $billions from these jabs? Has science-based medicine been hijacked? Lets remember that people once believed that smoking was harmless, or even good for you, because of the control that the tobacco industry had over media, government, and science.

- these developers are immune from liability

- the disease seems to be declining naturally as the virus comes into balance with us, just as the trillions of other viruses (that we are partly made of) have done for millions of years. (Though if this doesn't happen, that might be evidence that it is a weird lab-created virus!).

- mass vaccination (with imperfect vaccines) may actually cause the virus to mutate more, as Patrick Valance has said. This could increase the likelihood that naturally-gained and vaccine-gained immunity would fade. Watch this. Read this.

- Check out the (almost-non-existant) global reaction to the Hong Kong Flu in 1968. What has happened to us since then?! Might there have been way less harm caused today (lockdown collateral damage etc), had we reacted similarly? Or at least, shouldn't we have followed the pre-2020 pandemic guidelines, and done as the Great Barrington Declaration called for - just protected the vulnerable?

- I want to resist an agenda that clearly has little to do with our health. See how Ivermectin and other treatments have been suppressed. See how the catastrophic lockdown/mask harms have been downplayed/ignored. Why no cost/benefit analysis? See how the role of the innate immune system has been ignored - instead, mandated loneliness, stress, etc, has only increased vulnerability, to all kinds of diseases. See how GMO-king Bill Gates funds the WHO! See how $trillions of resources - on vaccines - have been deployed for billions of people who don’t need them, that could’ve been focussed on the small % who do!!

- I can't think of anything more important than resisting the corporate co-option of our immune systems

- Is our entire understanding of viruses and disease wrong? Is the environment the issue, not the virus? Shouldn't we focus on changing that? Do we need to stop fighting nature? We are made of germs, microbes, viruses! Good health is dependent on a diversity of them, that we get from interacting with each other/nature! What is all this isolation and germphobia doing to us? Isn't some illness actually good for our bodies, making us stronger in the long run?

- We know from history that it was improved environmental conditions (nutrition, sanitation, working conditions, etc), that reduced disease in the 19th/early 20th century; vaccines played a very small role. Why has there been no focus on nutrition etc?

- Why are adverse reactions not being properly recorded? Instead, we have to rely on self reporting, on the VAERS system etc.

- Assuming the jabs are definitely effective and safe, they should be given to vulnerable populations around the world first, not young adults like myself who're at no risk.

- Medical science is PROFOUNDLY corrupted

- The developers are already seeking permission for 'booster shots', so they clearly don't have much faith in their products! I do not want to have go and get a new shot every 6 months!

- Naturally-gained immunity is far superior to the highly specific antibody immunity acquired from vaccination.

- If I get very sick with Covid, I'll be able to get care. If I get very sick from the vaccine, I'll likely get gaslighted by doctors who have a cult-like devotion to vaccines/don't know how the hell to treat unusual jab injuries.

- Greater chance of infection after vaccination?

- Data so far suggests benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the risks

- temporarily suppresses immune function?

- risk of autoimmune disease with repeated boosters

- Pfizer covered up 1200 deaths?

- mRNA jabs don't prevent death

- The jabs reprogram your immune system?!

- Myocarditis

- Watch

- Read

- Read this study

- Read