Regenerative Agriculture

I have come to the conclusion that probably THE key solution to most of our problems lies in Regenerative Agriculture. It has the potential to heal the planet; reversing desertification; restoring soil, biodiversity and life; whilst providing healthy food, for all humanity. 

I'll keep a list of things to read and watch below. 

TED Talk: How regenerative farming can help heal the planet and human health

Greenpeace: The Regenerators

Are Cows The Cause Or Cure For Climate Change?

On Netflix: Kiss The Ground

How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change | Allan Savory

We Need Regenerative Farming, Not Geoengineering

Full length interview with Nicolette Hahn Niman from the filming of Sacred Cow

Vitamin D, COVID-19 and Allopathic Medicine

There is a Vitamin D deficiency epidemic throughout the world. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people have been linking this deficiency with increased mortality from the virus - see here for some studies. Watch this. I have been perplexed by the almost total lack of interest in nutrition and general wellbeing during COVID-19 despite it being very clear that it is those with comorbidities and deficiencies who're most at risk - and despite it being known that many of these health issues can be reversed, often very quickly, with a change in diet, and/or cheap supplements. (If anything, it seems like we've been encouraged to harm our wellbeing, with the constant fear, isolation etc!).

I have since discovered that doctors, (in the western world at least), learn almost nothing about nutrition at medical school, which I find shocking! 

I've been trying to figure out how the medical system ended up like this, and was recommended this book, which I'm currently half way through reading. It's a fascinating book, detailing how the system was set up primarily in the interests of corporate capitalism. The billionaires and elites of the late 19th and early 20th century favored allopathic (science-based) medicine, largely because it enabled them to further centralize and control society. Its reductionist approach to the human body enabled poor social and environmental conditions, brought on by capitalist exploitation, to be ignored, as root causes of illness. Non-allopathic practitioners, some of whom focussed more on things like diet and lifestyle, and who saw healthcare as more of an art form, and not something that a one-size-fits-all, departmentalized approach, could effectively address, opposed this monopolization of medicine by the 'science-based' approach. They were subsequently smeared as 'quacks', and put out of business. 

Of course, many of those non-allopathic practitioners were indeed 'quacks', and there have also been plenty of achievements with allopathic medicine, but unfortunately it seems that its reductionist approach is a major issue, and it appears that corruption and bias in favor of the interests of the subsequently enlarged and empowered pharmaceutical companies, is extreme. Read here, here, here, here. 

The reductionist approach to the human body, the influence of big pharma, and the almost total lack of understanding regarding nutrition, makes it very difficult for allopathic practitioners to heal chronic disease (of which there is now an epidemic), and mental health issues. Patients are given drugs, just to manage the disease (many of which are poorly tested/will negatively impact other parts of the body), when so often, a holistic approach and a change in diet is the medicine required, (...and a change in social/environmental conditions). It mostly seems to be a system of sickcare, rather than one of healing and wellbeing. And it all seems very anti-science to me!

Anyway, I thought I'd keep a list of things to read and watch below, about Vitamin D, as it seems to be one of the nutrients that people are most in need of. Though what people are really most in need of is a different approach to healthcare, (and a change in social conditions). I've been looking into Functional Medicine, which is a holistic, science-based approach, with a focus on food as medicine. Look it up on Wikipedia, and you'll see it described as 'quackery' and 'pseudoscience'. But surely it is allopathic medicine that should now be described as that, given what I've stated above, and given that it is, according to some, the third leading cause of death in the US! My allopathic doctor's surgery in California is now offering Functional Medicine, which hopefully indicates that it is becoming more accepted and popular.

• Recommendation for vitamin D is far too low, experts say
• Vitamin D toxicity is a myth
• Vitamin D – Why You are Probably NOT Getting Enough 
• 14 Signs Of Vitamin D Deficiency
• Vitamin D pills 'could stop colds or flu'
• Perfect Your Health with the Power of Vitamin D | Dr. Joel Gould on Health Theory
• Do You Need To Take A Vitamin D Supplement?
• Daily oral vitamin D supplementation for 12 months may improve cognitive function
• Study confirms vitamin D protects against colds and flu
• Vitamin D levels in the blood linked to cardiorespiratory fitness
• Top UK scientist urges people to take vitamin D supplements
• The Danger of Vitamin D Deficiency
• Vitamin D and Immune Function

-

I have now finished the book mentioned above. I thought I'd copy a few extracts from the last few pages here...

Scientific Medicine: Beliefs and Reality

Nearly all of us turn to medicine when we are sick. Whether the healer is called a shaman, a witch doctor, a priest, a feldsher, or a physician, we all seek someone in whom to place our confidence, someone we believe will make us well. Early in the 19th century, most Americans relied on lay healers. By the middle or latter part of the century, most Americans turned to physicians, who were being prodigiously produced in mushrooming medical schools throughout the land. At the time, one could choose the particular medical theory one wanted in a physician – from homeopathy to orthodox or “allopathic” medicine – or the particular type of healer – from herbal traditions to Christian science. Not until the last two decades of the last century were there any significant number of physicians who practised what they called “scientific” medicine, meaning a medical practice based on principles continuously being developed and refined by the analytical biological and physical sciences.

Today most of us look to doctors and hospitals and surgery and drugs to cure us of every ill. We want solace, and, therefore, we expect it. The medical profession has, of course, encouraged such beliefs through its campaign to increase the confidence of the populous. Other medical interest groups, like the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute have joined in the campaign for public confidence, frequently hosting briefing sessions for newspapers’ science and medical writers to learn about the “latest advances” in cancer treatment. We have come to credit scientific, technological medicine with having reduced the enormously high death rates of past centuries and with being effective against most disease and suffering in our time. Yet such past successes and current progress are greatly exaggerated.

Life, Death, and Medicine. The Historical Record.

Historical epidemiological evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that medical science has played a relatively small role in reducing mobility and mortality. Thomas McEwan argues very convincingly that improved health and the great decline in Western Europe’s total death rate from the 18th century to the present were due to four factors. First, nutrition improved because food supplies increased from the early 18th century, due initially to the reorganisation of agriculture rather than improved chemical or mechanical technology. Second, environmental sanitation measures – cleaning up the accumulated filth of the cities, assuring uncontaminated water supplies, and so forth – instituted by the late 19th century, added to improved nutrition and further reduced mortality particularly of children. These measures were well underway by the middle of the century, before either the concept of specific causes of disease or the germ theory was widely accepted. Third, these improvements in the standard of living caused a substantial increase in population, which would have overrun the gains in health if birthrates and family size had not soon sharply declined. Finally, specific preventative and therapeutic medical measures gradually introduced in the 20th century slightly accelerated the already substantial decline in mortality and also improved physical health. While science greatly extended the original non-technological advances in agriculture, hygiene, and birth control, the contribution of medical science to the overall reduction in death rates and improved health was relatively quite small.

In the great majority of cases the toll of the major killing diseases of the 19th century declined dramatically before the discovery of medical cures and even immunisation. Tuberculosis, the Great White Plague, was one of the dread diseases of the 19th century, killing 500 people per 100,000 population at mid century and 200 people per 100,000 in 1900. By 1967 the United States rate had dropped to 3 deaths per 100,000. This tremendous decline was only slightly affected by the introduction of collapse therapy in the 1930s and chemotherapy in the 1950s. Similarly, for England and Wales, John Powles shows that overall mortality declined over the last hundred years well in advance of specific immunisations and therapies.

René Dubos, the microbiologist formally with the Rockefeller Institute, succinctly summed up the historical record: “The tide of infectious and nutritional diseases was rapidly receding when the laboratory scientist moved into action at the end of the past century”, Dubos wrote in Mirage of Healthy. “In reality“, he observed, “the monstrous spectre of infection had become but an enfeebled shadow of its former self by the time serums, vaccines, and drugs became available to combat microbes”.

Improvements in general living and working conditions as well as sanitation, all brought about by labour struggles and social reform movements, are most responsible for improved health status. Improved housing, working conditions, and nutrition – not medical science – reduced TB‘s fearsome death toll. Responding to riots and insurrections as well as the pitiable living conditions of the poor and working classes in Western Europe and North America, nineteenth-century reformers brought dramatic declines in mortality without the benefit of even the germ theory.

Children have benefited the most from these changes. The average baby born in 1900 could have expected to live only forty-seven years. A baby born in 1973 can expect to live more than seventy-one years. Most of this increased life expectancy at birth has been due to a sharp decline in infant’ and young children’s deaths from infectious diseases. At the turn of the century, young children succumbed to influenza, pneumonia, diarrhoea, scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough, and measles. By 1975 the infant death rate had fallen to sixteen per 1000 live births - less than one ninth the rate in 1900. And the death rates of young children have similarly declined. Improved housing, nutrition, water supplies, and waste disposal, pasteurisation of milk, and the virtual elimination of child labor (except for migrant farm workers) drastically cut the spread of infectious diseases and enabled children’s bodies to resist them.

-

Members of the corporate class embraced scientific medicine because it supported their political and economic struggles. Technological medicine provides the corporate class with a compatible world view, an effective technique, a supportive cultural tool, and a focus on the disease process within the body that provides a convenient diversion from the health-damaging conditions in which people live and work...

...Their policies reflect a general corporate class concern that any excess sickness and death not be attributed to the admitted inequalities of capitalist society or to the organization of production that places profits before environmental protection and worker's health. In addition to this broad class interest, a growing interest group within the corporate class has a direct financial stake in the dominance of technological medicine.

Also read this.

The Great Reset and other so-called conspiracy theories... "Once we can access people's thoughts".

Check out the last two minutes of this film from the World Economic Forum, (a highly influential 'NGO'), about ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution’:

“Once we can access people’s thoughts and access people’s emotions”, she says.

WHAT THE FUCK.

How have we ended up in a situation in which just mentioning and wanting to discuss these factual agendas, like Agenda 21 or 'The Great Reset' (of which 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution' seems to be a part), makes you a ‘conspiracy theorist’?

It is so totalitarian! Clearly no debate or dissent allowed.

It looks like we’re to become half human, half robot slaves for the corporations, in a soulless, monoculture, dystopian world, and that’s that. We've no choice but to submit to the will of the corporations and Davos billionaires.

Don’t you just love ‘liberal democracy’?

I’m sure many people have been predicting this kind of thing for years and have been derided/censored as... ‘conspiracy theorists'... 

This isn't really a case of secret conspiracies. I don't really think there's a dark hidden agenda. It's out in the open. We just live in a highly centralized world - a trajectory we've been on for hundreds, thousands, of years - in which a few corporations/billionaires have huge power and influence over everything, and in which there’s now an open agenda to reset the global system, because more and more people are realizing that we're reaching a tipping point. So capitalist elites are having to act, essentially to appease the masses. This agenda involves some nice-sounding things ('sustainable development' etc) and some extremely terrifying and destructive-sounding things. It all involves centralized control over the world; and anyone who opposes this, and the destructive agendas, gets smeared as 'conspiratorial'. 

COVID-19 is being used as an excuse to accelerate us along this path. Read this. Somehow, we are being manipulated to accept the narrative that, ‘nothing in our lives will ever be the same again’, because of a virus with a 0.05% fatality rate for under 70s.

Obviously we do need big change, but ideally it would be good if that change didn’t involve us becoming half robot surveilled slaves to the corporatocracy, (not much different to now really, I guess!).

Let’s choose another path: watch this and this. Read this. We need decentralization! We all know that power corrupts, right?! So maybe global government isn't the best plan?!

....

Will keep a list of more things to read about this below.

The Great Reset: Where Do We Go From Here?

Brave Vandana Shiva speaks out against the Great Reset

Joe Biden, Boris Johnson, Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardhern, have all recently used the slogan 'Build Back Better'. Coincidence? 

Germ Theory or Terrain Theory. Which is Correct?

Some links...

Germ Theory Versus Terrain: The Wrong Side Won the Day

Virus + Terrain - A Meeting Of Minds

WHY OUR IMMUNE SYSTEM NEEDS EXPOSURE TO MICROBES AND THE SUN

Contagion Myth & Unconventional Ways To Treat Viruses

Random Covid Thoughts

With an aging population, lockdown loneliness/stress, and no effort to heal immune systems, there’s going to be a never-ending supply of susceptible people. Plus corporations/billionaires are raking it in. And politicians are in too deep.

I don’t see how we get out of this.

-

Imagine we’d spent $billions transforming the food system to organic/regenerative, educating about healthy eating, ending poverty, and getting everyone tested/treated for nutrient deficiencies/poor metabolic health.

Instead we’ve got a shit vaccine with no long-term safety data.

-

Corporations have made a killing this year. And billionaires/technocrats/politicians love the control it's giving them. 

They will want to maintain the 'new normal'.  

Keep this in mind!

-

Seems like Big Pharma+Big Food+Corporate Media basically want us to believe that the innate immune system isn’t even a thing. Heavily invested in poisoning us. Maybe we should use Covid as an opportunity to liberate ourselves from their grip?

-

The Covid vaccines I’ve researched so far are proven neither safe or effective. I guess mass media must just be looking at big pharma press releases.

-

Is it really helpful to refer to some people as ‘high risk’? Even most very elderly folks have like 95% chance of survival, right? But most probably now believe that Covid = certain death. It’s a mindset that will get us nowhere. Positive thinking best for immune system!

-

I think if humanity survives the coming centuries (doubt it), then this period now will be remembered as the real ‘Dark Ages’. 

People of the future will be like, “they had all that science at hand, but instead decided to listen to a software engineer? Wtf”.

-

We are partly made of viruses. Trillions of them in us. They’ve been key to our evolution. Immune systems of the vast majority of people can manage a new one, w/ few problems. Why has there been NO effort to heal those with immune systems that are less likely to be able to do so?

Instead: fear, stress, loneliness, lack of sunlight, lack of exercise, lack of nature = damaging immune systems even more. 

-

Linking COVID susceptibility with the industrial food system is essential imo. If we become more aware of what that ecocidal system is doing to our bodies, it will encourage us to seek big change and begin healing both the planet and ourselves.

-

From the care home disaster, to the suppression of treatments like HCQ, to the denial of evidence regarding Vitamin D deficiency, to the immune system-damaging fear-mongering and isolation, to the lack of interest in lockdown collateral damage, to the lack of preparation for winter... it does sometimes feel like this is a mass culling. But I guess it is mostly just incompetence + influence from Big Pharma?

-

The fact that we’ve poisoned our bodies and the environment so much, yet Covid has had a fatality rate of perhaps about 0.2% (and only 0.05% for under 70s), actually seems quite remarkable to me. Our bodies are clearly amazing things.

-

Whatever the efficacy of masks and of all the other measures taken in response to Covid, the fact that debate about it all has been so marginalised and censored, is disturbing as hell. Super totalitarian. And it’s not just about efficacy: it’s about cost/benefit. But seems we’re barely allowed to have that discussion.

-

We eagerly gave away our rights. I doubt we’ll be getting them back without a fight. This ‘new normal’ is brilliant for power-tripping politicians and a small but influential contingent of the corpotatocracy.

-

To reduce the number of serious viral infections this winter, authorities should’ve embarked on a massive campaign to address nutrient deficiencies, poor diet, the mental health crisis, poverty... 

Instead, everything they’ve done has made all of this worse.

-

Previous viruses/flu seasons have occurred, worse than Covid, yet aroused no reaction from global governments. So, rightly or wrongly, something has clearly changed. Shouldn’t we stop and consider what this might be? Especially considering the IMMENSE damage caused by the reaction?

-

We have a new virus because of human actions. People are dying with it, because of toxins in our food, water, air; again because of human actions. The solution is to change our actions! The solution is surely NOT to direct all our resources toward an ineffective, potentially unsafe, vaccine, that requires yet more destruction of life (mass slaughter of sharks and crabs), so big pharma can profit!

-

How could anyone believe that shutting down an incredibly unequal, exploitative global economy - with much of the global south effectively enslaved to, and reliant on, the global north - would be a sensible thing to do, and good for public health? 

-

How many countries/regions need to not bother with all these lockdown measures etc, and suffer less from Covid than those which did bother with them, before we consider the possibility that it’s other factors that are decisive in whether the virus will have a big impact or not?

-

When a planet is led by billionaires who're destroying that planet for profit and power, it's unsurprising that when a crises erupts from that destruction, the billionaires will do what they can to prevent the rest of the population from addressing those crises at their root, and even worse, use the crises to seek yet more profit and power. 

What is surprising is that the rest of the population falls for it.

-

Nearly 20 million people die every year from a cardiovascular disease. Why is there no global panic and effort to try and stop this?

Because sickness and death is highly profitable? 

If we had a system that actually cared about our health, we’d be focussing on getting to the bottom of all the illnesses currently afflicting us; we’d be changing the food system and detoxifying the environment.

-

We're conditioning kids to see their peers as threat and we're screwing up their development by limiting their ability to learn from other other's facial expressions etc. Seems likely that the long term impact of this will be profound.

-

We are all victims of systems that have poisoned us, via the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breathe; systems that have led to new viruses, and left us increasingly unable to cope with those viruses. Let’s focus on changing those systems, and healing people+planet.

-

There are so many studies showing that Vitamin D works, that hydroxychloroquine works, that a nutritious diet works, that isolation wrecks the immune system, that lockdowns don’t work and lead to all kinds of hell (poverty/hunger/suicide)... but what’s the plan? More lockdowns! 

-

‪If we continue following the diktats of Bill Gates & co, we‘ll continue with a whac-a-mole approach, focussing on ever-increasing symptoms, whilst ignoring the root cause of the human and environmental health crisis - mainly the food system that Gates & co impose on the world and profit from.

-

I hope once vaccines are out and big pharma is making $, that things will go back to ‘normal’. But I fear this won’t be the case and that the current paradigm, which is so great for many big money interests, is the new normal. Covid won’t be eradicated and there will be many other viruses to wage war on. War is a beloved pastime of this system/culture.

-

The world is on fire. The soil is almost destroyed. We’re literally going extinct. But the powers that be have us focussed on waging war on a virus which has done less harm than previous viruses/flu seasons that we didn’t even react to.

-

What is the plan with masks? When do we stop wearing the horrible things? Once there’s a 50% effective, temporary vaccine, that may not work at all on the 40% of Americans who’re obese? Then we’ll be safe to uncover our faces again? I don’t get it.

-

We have 60 years left of farmable soil. This must be THE priority right now. A way to honour the passing of those who’ve sadly died from Covid, thanks to their bodies being poisoned by the same food system that’s killed the soil, is to demand the radical change of that system!

-

You don’t need to be a ‘conspiracist’ to find it quite alarming when a billionaire goes on TV and declares that all humanity must be vaccinated, against a virus that is only a threat to those who’ve been sufficiently poisoned by the food system that this billionaire helps to impose. ...whilst saying nothing about the fact that this poisoning can be reversed very quickly!

-

The WHO says we can't go for herd immunity without the protection of a vaccine. But the vaccine is likely to only be 50% effective, and it seems it is designed to reduce symptoms rather than to stop transmission. How COULD we protect people? Perhaps by addressing Vitamin D deficiency and poor metabolic health?

-

Those dying during Covid are not doing so because of a lack of mask-wearing. They’re dying because they have corrupt governments that have poisoned their bodies via a chemical-ridden, industrial food system, for many years, leaving them unable to cope with a new virus. I mean, maybe they help in some circumstances, I don’t know, (my instinct is that they do more harm than good). But I see masks mostly as a way of shutting us up and keeping us from focussing on the root causes of the human and environmental health crisis. Perhaps less a conspiracy, and more just mass denial. Easier to wage war on an evil virus than it is to look at things more deeply.

But it’s also a massive threat to big capitalist interests to take a root-cause approach, so for sure those forces will conspire to prevent that and seek evermore profit, via vaccines etc, as the economic system demands of them.

-

What the World Health Organization has helped to do in Africa, in denying natural medicine for malaria, so that pharma corporations can profit, is fucking monstrous. All anti-racists and anti-capitalists should be speaking out against the fact that this organisation and big tech are now deciding what is and isn’t truth.

-

The virus itself isn’t ‘worse than science fiction’. The problems caused by the ridiculous reaction to it, are.

-

Millions killed and displaced in war. Planet plundered and nearly destroyed. People hooked on unnecessary and harmful drugs, and addictive, processed food. But all of a sudden the people and system that did this care for human health? Get a grip.

-

‪You’re not a better human being for wearing a mask and demanding others do so. It can easily be argued that the collectively responsible thing to do is to let the virus spread fully before winter, encourage and enable everyone to improve their wellbeing, and to go back to ‘normal’ asap, given the catastrophic consequences of lockdowns etc.‬

-

If the World Health Organization prioritised public health over big pharma profit, it would’ve advised governments back in January to enable and encourage all citizens to get nutritionally healthy - particularly to make sure people aren’t Vitamin D deficient.

It really couldn’t be more obvious that the priority is to profit off vaccines. Effective drugs and supplements suppressed/ignored. And no focus on diet whatsoever. More people dying as a result. Criminal.

-

‪Shutting down the world and spending $billions (or $trillions?) on vaccinating the entire human race because of a virus that’s been about twice as bad as flu, is completely insane. We have been played. ‬

Imagine we spent that on improving sanitation, ending hunger and changing the food system to organic/regenerative? Pretty much no one would die from a little virus if we did that. Instead, the Covid response has massively fueled hunger and further empowered the oligarchy that imposes the current poisonous food system‬!

And again - a vaccine may only be 50% effective, will probably be temporary, and will be very ineffective on the most vulnerable. And then there’s the issue of potential side effects of a rushed vaccine from criminally corrupt big pharma.

And many areas of the world - like Africa - have been almost completely unaffected by Covid. (Because they’ve not yet had western food system imposed on them? More chance of that now we’ve further empowered oligarchy!)

But now every African must be vaccinated against the virus?! WTF.

-

The problem with saying ‘just listen to the epidemiologists!’ is that the epidemiologists aren’t going to tell us that the policies implemented based on the information they put forward will impoverish half a billion people, starve millions of kids to death, fuel a rise in other illnesses, fuck up our immune systems, fuel domestic violence, fuel depression and suicides, enrich the 0.1%, etc.

-

The response to Covid has been massively destructive in the short term - hundreds of millions pushed into poverty/hunger etc - and has the potential to be profoundly destructive in the long term, as we all become scared to do anything or get close to anyone. Interacting with each other and with nature (same thing really) is vital for life. No new normal!!!

-

‪Why has there been hardly any concern about the short and long term consequences of the response to Covid, from anyone, on all sides of the political spectrum (but particularly the left)? Nor hardly any opposition to big pharma influence? It‘s depressing. The irrationality and reductionism is extreme.‬

-

Upcoming rushed vaccines will likely be ineffective on those with underlying conditions - ie those most vulnerable to Covid. And there‘s been no effort to help these people heal - instead, lockdowns have fueled a rise in these conditions!

The focus on vaccines rather than on wellbeing is completely insane.

And even on healthy people, a vaccine may only be 50% effective, and temporary. But we simply cannot go back to normal until we get this?!

None of this makes any sense.

-

During Covid, the left has been silent about looming famines caused by lockdowns, silent about censorship of those who oppose lockdowns, silent about criminalization of protest, silent about hugely positive impact of Vitamin D etc, silent about blatant influence of big pharma. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Instead, the left: ‘shut up about the immune system and all the starvation and just cover your bloody face until we get an ineffective, unsafe vaccine from our saviours in big pharma! We can only return to normal once $trillions of our tax money has been given to AstraZenica & co!’

‘And no of course we shouldn’t instead spend this money on healing people and planet. That’s ridiculous. We must continue lockdowns that empower those who’re destroying people and planet and fueling disease and extinction! Duh’.

-

When humans are dying because of what our systems have done to the world, the solution is to quickly change those systems, not to spend $trillions on pointless, potentially unsafe vaccines; not to literally silence ourselves with masks; not to go into a deep state of denial.‬

-

‪The problem is that the current system relies on keeping us sick, with poisonous food/pharmaceuticals, for $. What’s needed in response to Covid, and all other illnesses afflicting us, is mass healing. But that’s incompatible with the system and the financial interests of those at the top.‬

‪So instead, we just continue doing more of the same, always avoiding getting to the root of our issues, instead desperately and hopelessly suppressing symptoms but not the underlying disease - the economic system, concentration of power, disconnection from nature. Extinction here we come.‬

-

‪There is literally nothing that will convince me to accept a Covid vaccine. I’d like to get the virus naturally (assuming I haven’t had it already) and update my immune system. This is how we evolved for millions of years. Let’s cut back a bit on playing god.‬

-

Is it really accurate to say that people die ‘of’ Covid? Aren’t all ‘Covid deaths’ caused by the body being unable to process a new virus, due to diet-related comorbidities/environmental factors? Do we demonise viruses to avoid looking at the bigger picture?

-

‪Why is it that one person will be completely unaffected by Covid but another person will get very sick, & maybe die? ‬

‪The condition of ‘the terrain’...?‬

‪Is contagion (of sickness) a myth? The poisons in the food, water, air are the problem, not the germ? 

-

So, spending $trillions vaccinating the entire human race, with mostly ineffective, potentially unsafe, vaccines, because of a virus that’s only fatal for a tiny % of people (and only due to diet-related comorbidities and environmental factors). This is still the plan?

Any chance we humans could stop confirming our current status as the most stupid, destructive lifeform Mother Nature has produced?

-

Instead of addressing the root cause of terrorism - mainly, capitalism and imperialism - we waged more war and built a security state.

Instead of addressing the root cause of disease - mainly, capitalist toxification of the environment/our bodies - we wage war on a virus and continue building that security state.

Dystopia, here we come.

-

To a significant extent, the entire western approach to healthcare is a massive scam, so of course the approach to Covid is too. As ever, the priority is to make $, not to improve wellbeing, and many more will die with Covid as a result.

-

‪Declaring that you are ‘pro-vaccine’ is just so dumb. Like what, literally all of them? Even the ones we know big pharma lied about that killed and poisoned loads of people? ‬

‪Capitalists are virtuous truth-tellers all of a sudden? Stop being a tool. ‬

‪Seems pretty obvious that the main purpose of vaccines is to make $, to help impose western influence in the global south, and to prevent us from getting to the root of our issues - ie the for-profit poisoning of the planet and subjugation/exploitation of people.‬

-

Terrain Theory: viruses are an update from nature, for our bodies/immune systems, that only cause fatality when the ‘terrain’ of the body, or the terrain of the environment that the body is in, is so toxified, that it can’t process the update.

I’m obviously not clever enough to know whether this theory is true, but it would be awesome if it was. Mother Nature trying to help us out! But we keep telling her to F off, because we refuse to come to terms with how much we’ve toxified our food, water, air...

-

Instead of dealing with the root cause of terrorism - capitalism and imperialism - we waged more war and built a security state, edging towards dystopia.

Instead of dealing with the root cause of disease - capitalist toxification of the environment/our bodies - we wage war on a virus; on nature. We continue building that security state and heading towards dystopia.

-

It’s fine to encourage people to do whatever they can to take control of and improve their own wellbeing, whilst also demanding the structural changes and government interventions necessary to make that more achievable. Sadly, the left’s Covid response hasn’t involved either.

-

To believe that there is 'one truth', as defined by western 'culture'/oligarchy, when it comes to science and medicine, is ignorant, arrogant, and racist.

-

The best thing you can do right now is stop following ‘the news’ and completely forget about Covid. Don’t let them wreck yourself with worry.

-

I'm beginning to think that most people will never accept that the harm done by experimental lockdowns in response to a new virus FAR outweighs any benefits (if there are any at all).Weary face

We have FAMINES on the way!

And still, the focus is purely on masks, lockdowns and vaccines, with basically no effort to address Vitamin D deficiency, poor diet, etc. I guess everyone is just very eager for Big Pharma and Big Food to profit and continue keeping us sick. 

-

Wherever big corporations and the industrial food system go, disease goes too. That’s the contagion we need to eradicate.

-

Decades of propaganda smearing anyone who questions anything at all about vaccines as 'anti-vax nutters' seems to be paying off right now. Not matter how corrupted, nonsensical and anti-science it all is, it seems the masses will mostly go along with big pharma's Covid agenda. Sad. 

-

A science-based approach to a new virus would involve an effort to improve the general health of the population and detoxify the environment.

-

The WHO says 10% of the world may have already been infected. 1 million have died. So, worst case scenario is 10 million deaths, (which could be massively reduced if we actually started approaching this thing sensibly).

Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of people now face famines because of the (possibly mostly futile) measures we've taken in response to the virus. 

-

You need to be very insane to volunteer yourself for a vaccine that’s been developed by for-profit criminal organisations, in less than 1 year, when every previous vaccine has taken at least 4 years, and when there’s never been a safe coronavirus vaccine developed previously. ‬

‪And, sounds like it isn’t even really going to be a vaccine, but instead just something that might reduce symptoms a bit. ‬

‪I am dumbfounded as to how anyone can see this as a risk worth taking. ‬

‪For the vast majority, the vaccine is a far greater risk than the virus, which is only fatal for a tiny % of those who’re so toxified/lacking in nutrients that their bodies can’t cope.‬ Solution? Detoxify! Eat well!

-

A science-based approach to a new virus would involve an effort to improve the general health of the population and detoxify the environment.

-

Take two people. Expose them both to the same virus. One is fine, the other dies. Why? Because it's the 'terrain' of the body that is the issue, not the virus? But germ theory dogma has us focussing on waging war on viruses, largely because there's money in that, whereas healing is a massive threat to various industries.

-

It is so deranged and dangerous for authorities to be stating that Covid is a threat to everyone. It's a threat only to those who're so toxified/living in such toxic environments, and/or to those who're so lacking in nutrients/a diverse micro biome, that their bodies cannot cope.

-

There were 650,000 flu deaths globally a few years ago. ‬

There’s been 1 million Covid deaths this year - but how many who died ‘with’ it were recorded as dying ‘of’ it? Do they do this with flu deaths too? And how many died of Covid who would’ve otherwise died of flu this year?‬

Not that anyone really dies ‘of’ a virus according to Terrain Theory, but in any case, the experimental measures we’ve taken in response to a virus that’s not even been twice as deadly as a bad flu year, are completely insane. Famines and a big spike in cancer deaths loom.‬

-

Capitalist authorities telling us how to have sex, who we can meet up with, when we can go outside, what we must wear over our faces, how we can protest (we can’t)...

Maybe it’s time to stop and consider how terrifying all this is?

-

‪Having learnt about terrain theory, and the microbiome, a war on viruses does kinda seem like a war on life itself.‬

-

‪It feels like we’re so desperate to avoid accepting what we’ve done/had done to ourselves, with all the toxic, processed food, the pollution etc, so instead, we’re going along with yet more destructive policies. It’s all so sad.‬

-

So we’re spending $trillions to inject rushed vaccines, developed by criminals, into billions of people who aren’t at risk from the virus, rather than focusing on improving the health of the small % of people who’re vulnerable, & on changing the systems that made them vulnerable?

Human stupidity is truly something to behold!

-

Why am I expected to accept a rushed vaccine, developed by criminals, against something that is no threat to me? Please someone stop this insanity.

-

Can anyone explain why there hasn’t yet been an effort to address widespread Vitamin D deficiency before winter? And an effort to enable and encourage healthy eating/lifestyle?

-

If I was old, no way in hell would I want to destroy the lives of younger people and make the world go to shit, for my sake (supposedly). Nor would I want to spend my last period of ‘life’ in isolation and potentially die alone.

I’d rather make myself as healthy as possible, carry on seeing family and friends, actually having some kind of life, whilst accepting that there’s another virus going around that my aged body might not be able to manage, and that my time here might be up.

Maybe we should have a vote: ask all over 75s what they’d prefer we do?

-

Given how nonsensical and contradictory all the results of the various measures/non-measures taken in response to Covid across the world have been, might it be worth considering the possibility that our entire approach to viruses is based on bad science?

-

Herd immunity has always been the longterm policy, right? They just want to wait until we get those rushed, ineffective vaccines? (i.e. until AstraZenica & co are making $).

-

Still trying my best to understand why the left is completely silent about factors that we know cause people to die with Covid; like low vitamin d and poor diet. Isn't the point of anti-capitalism to do whatever we can to not be under the thumb of capitalists?

-

‪Is there not as much evidence for saying that Belarus had few deaths because they didn’t lock down as there is for saying that New Zealand had few deaths because they did lock down?‬

‪Not saying I understand any of it, but sure seems correlation only equals causation when it suits‬

-

‪I’m not equating them with Covid, but had we done loads of testing for SERS and MERS, as we have done with Covid, we’d have found loads of cases, right? 

-

‪I don’t think there’s a conscious conspiracy to do so, but I do think authorities have, via incompetence and ignorant policies, effectively encouraged people to make themselves more susceptible to Covid. ‬‬

-

I fear a ‘zero virus’ strategy is a recipe for perpetual lockdowns, surveillance, centralisation, destruction of small business, swindling of the working class, empowerment of the 0.1%... ultimately leading to totalitarian dystopia, and extinction. But maybe that’s just me.

-

Even if you’re convinced upcoming vaccines are going to be 100% safe, we know that they’re not going to be very effective - particularly on the vulnerable - so why not demand action to address vitamin deficiencies and poor diet? Both heavily correlated with Covid susceptibility?

-

Authorities are getting RUSHED, mostly ineffective vaccines out to vulnerable people, potentially by the end of this year. I don’t understand why we aren’t more concerned by this. Addressing nutrient deficiencies would offer real protection, from Covid, and all diseases. Why not do this?

-

Supporting mandatory/coercive vaccinations is disturbing enough, but supporting mandatory/coercive vaccinations by corporations with long histories of extreme criminality?! This is a level of insanity that I really can’t get my head around.

Dr Fauci taking Vitamin D - why the silence until now?

In an interview the other day, Dr Anthony Fauci - who is leading the US response to Covid - said, “if you are deficient in Vitamin D, that does have an impact on your susceptibility to infection”. He recommended supplements and says he takes them himself.

And not only does he take them, it seems (unless it's a typo in his email) that he takes 10x the government-recommended dose! 

Why doesn’t he recommend this formerly, and why didn’t he do so before 200,000 people died? Or at least, why hasn’t he, and the WHO, called for more trials and studies?

There have been multiple studies concluding that Vitamin D deficiency is a major factor in whether or not people are badly affected by Covid. See here, here, here, here, here, here, for just a few. (And there's list of all studies here and here).

Once again, I am convinced that the priority with Covid is for Big Pharma corporations to profit, (from vaccines). And that is nothing new, given that Vitamin D deficiency has long been an epidemic, with authorities doing little to address it. In fact, it is authorities that have caused such nutrition deficits, by imposing a poisonous, junk food system on the world! There's more money in sickness than wellbeing.

-

See video here of Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, admonishing Fauci.

Is this our future?

Expect mass depression and suicides if this is the future. Who the hell wants to live like this?

The solution to viruses that threaten unhealthy people is surely to protect those people, and enable and encourage them to heal and get as healthy as possible. Ultimately I think we need to revolutionise the poisonous, ecocidal food system with regenerative agriculture, but in the short term - let’s allow vulnerable people to take early retirement, let's make it free to see a nutritionist, let's address widespread Vitamin D deficiency.

The solution is surely NOT to shut down the world, cause famines, implement police states, cover our faces with toxic polyester, distance ourselves from nature, force elderly people to die alone, enrich billionaires, destroy small businesses, hinder people from getting treatment for other illnesses, make everyone fearful and anxious, fuel domestic violence, and spend $trillions rolling out rushed, ineffective, potentially unsafe vaccines from criminal pharma corporations.