Given that there’s never been a safe, effective coronavirus vaccine; given that no vaccine has been developed in less than four years; given that the evidence points to upcoming rushed, experimental vaccines being... not very ineffective and potentially unsafe... (and who would trust these companies on safety anyway?!); given that the virus is mutating; given some major issues with certain vaccines in the past; given that historically vaccines do not work so well on those most vulnerable; given the catastrophic collateral damage of lockdowns; given that most lockdown policies may have been largely ineffective anyway; given the potential for permanent totalitarianism in waging wars on respiratory viruses; given that ‘Terrain Theory’ makes more sense to me; given that the virus has already spread widely and may have done its worst; and given that the virus has been nowhere near as deadly as some predicted, I came to the conclusion months ago that we don't have much choice but to accept the spread of COVID-19, (having initially been of the view that we must attempt to contain and eradicate it).
Having come to this conclusion, I have felt that we should instead - as supported by many eminent epidemiologists - let non-vulnerable people continue life mostly as normal, whilst focussing our resources on protecting (and healing) the vulnerable; enabling early retirement, doing whatever we can to address nutrient deficiencies/poor diet etc; reducing pollution and all environmental toxicity that affects the immune system; and reaching population immunity asap, rather than waiting and getting it with rushed vaccines, which seems to be Bill Gates' and the World Health Organisation's plan. (Are we actually already well on our way to it, particularly because we had significant prior immunity? Has the virus done its worst?).
Even if you think all the horrific collateral damage is worth it and that vaccines really will save the vulnerable, and are worth the risk, why would we not at least put some effort into healing vulnerable people, especially given that so many studies have shown that things like Vitamin D deficiency hugely impacts Covid susceptibility? Watch this. And we know that the vast majority of those dying with Covid have diet-related commorbidities. Watch this.
I feel we should use Covid as an opportunity to reclaim our bodies, and the planet, from the industries that have been poisoning us and the environment; the industries that fuel disease and leave us susceptible. Instead, we’re doing the opposite; we’re just hiding in fear and waiting for a savior from Big Pharma. Linking Covid susceptibility with the industrial food system and a healthcare system corrupted by Big Pharma, is essential, in my view. If we become more aware of what these destructive, ecocidal industries and systems are doing to our bodies, it will encourage us to seek big change and begin healing both the planet and ourselves.
Here's a list of questions that have been running through my head:
- Why are we barely acknowledging the research that suggests the virus is nowhere near as bad as some expected? Less bad than the flu for under 70s? Why were alarmists elevated at the beginning of the epidemic, (and still today)? Were models based on the entire population being susceptible? Wasn't this a bit insane, given that the virus had been present for many months with no mass death, and given that it is very similar to previous coronaviruses? And given the fatality rate on the Diamond Princess cruise ship? Is it true that 40-60% of carriers for ~80+ days will not develop Covid disease? Why are we told that we are all at risk, when this is not the case?
- Why has the UK locked down twice, both times seemingly after the point where cases had started flattening? The virus was present in Europe for months before lockdowns, during the middle of winter. Why did it take so long for an epidemic to occur, given that few restrictions were in place during that time? Was it just gradually building up and making it's way to the most susceptible, and was the impact of the virus already 'locked in' before lockdowns were implemented?
- Is it really necessary to be forcing asymptomatic carriers to isolate? Is there conclusive evidence of significant asymptomatic spread? This study suggests they are not contagious.
- Why didn’t we consider the dire implications of lockdowns, especially in an extremely unequal, globalised world? And the impact on other illnesses? And the potential impact of normalizing social distancing and separation? And sterilization? Good health is dependent on interaction with each other and nature. Why are authorities referring to this as a 'new normal', rather than making clear that it is only temporary? Why has Fauci said we should never shake hands again?! This demonization of human interaction is incredibly harmful and anti-science. At schools, are we conditioning children to fear life and to see their peers as threats? What will be the long term consequences of this? Is their development being negatively impacted by mask wearing and not being able to see each other's facial expressions? Why haven't we weighed up the costs of these measures with potential benefits? This study concludes that there will be millions of life years lost due to school closures.
- Why has there been no focus on addressing nutrient deficiencies and metabolic health? The former would be a very cheap and easy thing to do, via supplementation, to quickly and significantly reduce the susceptibility of the population. And even metabolic health can be improved rapidly. This study suggests that it is a key factor in susceptibility.
- Why was a treatment - Hydroxychloroquine - that was effective in certain circumstances, withdrawn, based on trials in which excessive doses were given? Similarly, another cheap drug - Ivermectin - has been shown to be effective in some studies. Why is this being ignored?
- Why are we pinning all our hopes on (multi-$billion) rushed, experimental vaccines, when there’s never been a safe or effective coronavirus vaccine, when they’re probably only going to reduce symptoms rather than prevent infection, and when they may not even be very effective at doing that, (particularly on the vulnerable)? The flu shot has never been very effective. And when they may be harmful, especially given the lack of long term trials, the lack of testing on the vulnerable, and the issue of 'Antibody Dependent Enhancement'? And when the virus has mutated, potentially thousands of times? How many vaccinations we will 'need' exactly?! Wouldn't at least some of this money be better spent on a major public health campaign to ban junk food, and improve nutritional and metabolic health? (And end poverty!).
- I have noted down all the questions I have about Covid vaccines here. Unless you’re in a high risk group and confident that it's worth the risk, I don’t understand why anyone would get an experimental vaccine with no long term trials. Antibody-dependent enhancement is a big worry. Natural infection seems far less of a risk. Shouldn't we just let the body do as it’s done for thousands of years? And reduce chance of symptoms and spread by focusing on nutritional and metabolic health? Why is media making out that the vaccines are far more effective than they actually are? The relative risk reduction may be approx 90%, but why aren’t we being told about absolute risk reduction, which seems to be less than 1%? How is it that a vaccine which lacks long-term safety data, and that offers an absolute risk reduction of approx 1%, is being seen as our ‘light at the end of the tunnel’? If Covid really is a severe threat, surely this is an extremely dangerous deception? As it will just give people a false sense of security? ‘No need to worry about social distancing, or about looking after my immune system... I’ve got my (temporary?) 1% protection!’.
- What kind of unbelievably stupid society would roll out a new medical procedure to billions of people without conclusive proof that it won't cause serious damage, including infertility, for a virus with a 99.5% survival rate that's already done its worst, and for which their are already effective and safe treatments?
- Why are we OK with destroying more ecosystems in order to get these vaccines, at a time when we all know that the planet is dying? And are we all OK with animal testing?
- Fear, isolation, separation, lack of sunlight, lack of exercise... all of this is dreadful for the immune system. Why hasn’t this been considered? Haven't we just made lots more people susceptible to disease? Is our approach far too reductionist? Why weren't people encouraged to get lots of sun (Vitamin D) during the Summer, when there were hardly any Covid deaths?
- Why has there been no effort to get people to heal their immune systems?! Surely lockdowns are completely pointless without an effort to do this? At best, all they do is delay the inevitable?
- Why are stats presented to us, in media, without context? (Eg a report might say something like, 'ICUs approaching capacity', without mention of the fact that with our underfunded health services, this is normal for winter, and that many are actually designed to be at 80-90% capacity permanently). Why is it frequently ignored that number of cases found very much depend on number of tests being done? Why is it not highlights that a country/regions impact will depend hugely on how deadly the previous flu season was? This is insensitiely known as the 'dry tinder' effect!
- Why are we ignoring Sweden, and all the other countries (much of Africa, Japan, Myanmar, Belarus, Nicaragua, etc), that responded to the virus in a more lax manner, yet have had barely any/far less deaths than many countries that responded robustly?
- Are we registering those who're dying 'with' the virus as dying 'of' the virus, even though they may have had a commorbitity which was the actual cause of death?
- Why are we using the PCR test, when its inventor advised against this? Why are we calling all positive tests results 'cases', when the 'cycle threshold' of the test is at a level that it will pick up anything, not just Covid, and benign remnants of virus? It looks like the NHS in the UK is using a threshold of 45 cycles; Dr Anthony Fauci has said that anything above 35 cycles is meaningless. If we’d mass tested with a PCR test during the SARS outbreak in 2003, would we have also found millions of ‘cases’? Is is possible, as Dr Michael Yeadon and Ivor Cummins argue, that the pandemic is actually mostly over, but that these tests are making it appear as though it is ongoing everywhere? Why are we not using Rapid Antigen tests instead? The World Health Organization has now finally issued a statement about some of the issues with PCR testing.
- We're likely going to have increasing numbers of excess deaths caused by lockdowns. If mass testing continues, will many of these deaths be falsely labelled as Covid deaths? This seems like a recipe for perpetual hell. Especially given that authorities are not going to want to acknowledge the damage caused by lockdowns. And given that they're drunk on power? And given that this 'new normal' is fantastic for much of the 0.1% - biggest upwards transfer of wealth ever, this year?
- Is the virus now endemic in most places? Has it followed a 'Gompertz curve' wherever its hit, with most population control measures making little difference? How can we still be in the midst of a pandemic, if excess deaths in Europe are at average levels for this time of year? See here, that all cause mortality is below the 5 year average in London, and has been since May. Is it true that the 'second wave' is largely just areas that weren't hit badly in Spring? ie. is it an extension of the first wave, that was interrupted by Summer/herd immunity reached in many areas?
- In the stats, shouldn't we be separating symptomatics from asymptomatics? Is it really correct or helpful to refer to the latter as 'cases'? Aren't they just very healthy people, their bodies doing as the human body has done for thousands of years without any problems?
- Why are we being encouraged to get the flu shot, despite the fact it seems to have disappeared, and despite this, this, and this? How has the flu disappeared around the world?! We're told it's thanks to the social distancing and lockdowns, but why would that almost completely eradicate the flu, but do nothing to stop 10% of the global population (according to the WHO) from getting Covid?! Is there some misdiagnosis going on?
- Why were hospitals and resources not prepared for a continued pandemic/new endemic virus, this winter?
- Why aren't we having a philosophical discussion about what actually constitutes 'living'? Is it really reasonable or ethical to be forcing millions of elderly people to live in isolation for the last period of their lives, because of a virus that, even for their age group, is very survivable (especially if they are metabolically healthy)? Is it really reasonable to force many of them to die alone? Should it not be their choice as to whether or not they want to take the risk with Covid? Isn't a month spent with family, before dying, better than a year in isolation, before dying? Isn't there more to life than just existing? Watch this.
- Why are some eminent epidemiologists, who oppose the current strategy, being smeared and ignored? Why are Facebook, YouTube, censoring them and others?
- Why are we reacting so robustly and fearfully to a new virus that seems to have been less deadly than new viruses we experienced in the past, like the Hong Kong Flu in 1968, to which we barely reacted? What's changed, and is it definitely for the better? More awareness (and panic) thanks to connection via social media? More global centralisation of power? More monopolised and influential industry (big pharma) able to take advantage of the situation? More atheism and fear of death?! Is it a continuation of a trajectory we've been on for hundreds, thousands, of years, towards greater fear and control?
- Are we one hundred percent certain that widespread use of cloth masks is appropriate? Why were mask mandates introduced in the middle of the Summer when almost no one was dying and it was quite clear that this is a seasonal virus? If anything, shouldn't Covid spread have been encouraged during the Summer, in order to reach herd immunity before winter?
- Why is it being ignored that surgical masks may contain PFAS, especially now that we know exposure to PFAS is likely to increase risk of severe Covid infection?!
- Why is the contribution of pollution being ignored?
- How come essential workers in supermarkets, without masks, constantly interacting with the public, and working throughout the epidemic, didn't die in big numbers? Why haven't homeless people suffered more from the virus?
- Why are we ignoring conflicts of interest? Like the fact that the World Health Organization is now largely funded by Bill Gates, who not only is a proponent of the industrial agriculture that has fueled disease and susceptibility, but is also a massive proponent of an approach to healthcare that relies on vaccines rather than improving the overall health of people and planet? (He has doubled his wealth in recent years). Read this. And is it not worth noting that his foundation funded Imperial College, from which much of the alarmist Covid modeling came? Also, read this, about SAGE. And here's what Kary Mullis (inventor of the PCR test) had to say bout Dr. Fauci.
- Why did the WHO change its guidelines? Why have they changed the definition of 'herd immunity'?!
- Is our understanding of viruses incorrect? Haven't they been key to our evolution? Don't we need to start focussing on healing 'the terrain'? Is there much hope for our species, and millions of others, if we don't start addressing the crisis in human/planetary health at its root?
- Is our response to Covid demonstrating why centralization of power, including a centralized healthcare system (particularly an allopathic one), is so dangerous? Has the very existence of a 'World Health Organisation' helped lead to the imposition of a one-size-fits all approach to the virus across the world, with little thought given to whether or not certain countries have the resources to cope with a lockdown? Has it enabled powerful, for-profit interests to more easily exploit public health crises for profit? Watch this. And this.
- Has the virus been around for longer than we first thought?
- Why is Africa CDC seeking to vaccinate 60% of Africans, when Africans have barely been affected by Covid? See here and here for studies in Malawi and Kenya, showing high virus spread with little impact. A list of CDC partners might provide some explanations.
- Why are we ignoring the studies showing that asymptomatic transmission is very minimal? Why are we ignoring the studies showing that spread in schools is minimal?
- Was there a rush to judgement as to the viruses origins? Might it have come from the laboratory that just happens to be in Wuhan? The nature of the virus points to this possibility.
- Does the media narrative around new variants make much sense? As of February 2020, there had been 65,000 variants detected, according to a WHO study.
- Have many of the Covid swab tests been sterilized in cancerous chemical?
- Hasn't all-cause mortality been increasing in recent decades, with an unexpected dip in 2019, and is that context being considered when analyzing the number of excess deaths in 2020?
More questions here.
It's hard not to come to the conclusion that in response to Covid, we've done a lot of mostly pointless and incredibly destructive things, whilst completely ignoring effective strategies for saving lives.
It's probably important to note that there's a small number of very powerful and very destructive companies, in need of business, for which Covid is a massive opportunity. This is surely a massive factor in a lot of the above. Read this. I would also recommend reading this, which I mentioned in a previous post.
And look up Zach Bush MD!!! He is the one person I've come across who clearly knows his stuff, and who just talks total sense. Here's one interview with him, but there's loads of others.
